ministry in Middlebury. The first occurred in 1799, and resulted in
large additions to the church, an account of which appears in the
Connecticut Evangelical Magazine, Volume III., 64th and 102d pages, and
lately re-published by President Tyler, of East Windsor, one of his
spiritual children, and who fitted with him for college. He was dismissed
from that people, April, 1809, in the midst of an uncommon
religious inquiry, especially among the youth, for daring to reprove sin
in an aggravated case, the parties being wealthy, and of high standing
in society, to the grief of many of his friends. During the summer
following he supplied the pulpit in North Stonington, and in the autumn
of the same year he received a unanimous call to be pastor over the
church and society in Stonington Borough. He was installed on the
6th of December. For twenty years he continued to discharge the
duties of his office, almost without interruption, until within two weeks
of his death, which occurred October 29th, 1829. As a preacher he
was earnest and popular. He was very ready, no exigency finding him
unfurnished with appropriate thoughts and language, many of his best
efforts being extempore. He was successful, referring only to the last
scene of his labors, the stability, union, and strength of a society that
had previously languished from the want of a regular ministry for
several years alone furnishing ample testimony. In 1822 sixty were
added to the church, and some were added nearly every year of his
ministry. As a pastor we have room to mention only one prominent
trait in his character. He was distinguished for tenderness and sym-
pathy towards the sick and bereaved, and was rendered more so by
the loss of his son in 1819—Charles Theodore, of beloved memory—
a youth whom his classmates in college will long remember as the most
amiable of their number, and as a candidate for the very first collegiate
honors, and concerning whom his marble says truly, “of great promise
and of hopeful piety.” Though this loss deeply wrung the father’s
heart with anguish, yet the man of God triumphed over the feelings
of the father, and as he closed the eyes of his son, he said with true
Christian dignity, “the will of the Lord be done.” I will add, like
Leigh Richmond he mourned over this child of his fondest hopes to
the day of his death. It eminently gratified him to be a “son of
consolation” to the bereaved, and this trait greatly endeared him to his
people. The remote occasion of his death was a severe contusion in
his side, received by a fall from his carriage in the middle of September,
1829. He was confined to the house only two weeks. Early in
his confinement he said, as if anticipating the result, “Now I want
dying grace, and I have it.” Subsequently, of a Saviour supreme and
divine he said: “Here is firm footing; here is solid rock. With
Hooker I will say, ‘I am going to receive mercy.’” To his wife he
|